The debate over React Native vs. Hybrid apps for startups has been going on since 2015 when we first heard of React Native. The debate is not over which platform is more efficient but which is better suited to the needs of startups: Faster time to market, higher quality, and lower app development costs.
A group of software engineers believes hybrid apps are developed much more quickly and cheaply because they involve web developers rather than native mobile app developers. They applaud that it requires less time investment and promises to make businesses’ brands visible on all mobile devices while saving time on creating multiple code versions.
Now, everything is correct. Here are some of the many advantages of using hybrid apps that businesses swear by:
- They can reach a larger audience across multiple platforms.
- They are allowed to create an offline version of the app.
- The apps do not require advanced graphics performance as native applications do.
Hybrid apps provide you with everything you read above, up to the level of precision.
But have you ever considered the cost? At what point do the benefits and drawbacks of hybrid mobile apps become worthwhile to invest in?
When you consider the compromises that your startup will have to make in terms of features and performance that your users expect, the overall negative impact of using hybrid apps becomes clear, as do the many limitations of hybrid apps.
Before investing in hybrid app development, you should ask yourself the following questions:
- Is it really necessary for your user to use an unresponsive and slow application?
- Would you want to use an app that looks like an Android app if you’re on iOS?
- Would you want to spend time on an Android application that looks and operates like an iOS app?
Isn’t the answer an obvious no?
The choice of Hybrid app development for startups does not end there, and several pressing issues distinguish a native app from a hybrid app.
Issues Associated With Hybrid App Development
A comparison of Native and Hybrid apps demonstrates how far Hybrid lags behind Native in terms of performance.
Hybrid apps add an extra layer between the source code and the targeted mobile platform, which is expected to reduce performance.
While the degree of difference varies from application to application, the fact that Facebook migrated their app from HTML5 to React Native says a lot. This is just one example of its impact on large-scale applications.
The additional layer introduced by hybrid app creation makes debugging a complete nightmare. Mobile app developers must rely on the framework to experiment with specific operating systems, hoping that no new bugs are introduced into their applications.
On the other hand, because it is unlikely that the developers have a complete understanding of the chosen platform, determining the exact cause of the problem can be time-consuming.
When you require clients to create an account and sign in every time they access your application, you will struggle to collect utilization and performance metrics that can help you improve your application. On the other hand, adding a sign-in screen each time a user loads your application may limit engagement and increase bounce rates.
Lacks 3D Support and Graphics
If your application requires a 3D component or eye-catching graphic design. Because hybrid applications lack eye-catching illustrations and 3D support, the native application is the better choice. If you want 3D support in hybrid applications, developers must work extra hard to close the design quality gap using third-party tools like Unity 3D.
Challenge in Adding the Latest Features
One of the surest paths to startup success is to be at the cutting edge of technology, utilizing all upcoming software capabilities and feature sets. However, one of the most significant disadvantages of Hybrid apps is the difficulty of adding new features and capabilities to the Hybrid framework.
So, where does this leave entrepreneurs on a tight budget who aren’t ready to invest in a Native app?
This is where the React Native mobile app comes in, clearly distinguishing between native and hybrid apps for the startup debate.
Here are the ways React Native has effectively killed hybrid apps, at least for startups that have refused to sacrifice quality for cost and time savings. Those who chose to support React Native compared React Native vs. Hybrid apps.
In the React Native vs. Hybrid apps for startups debate, here are the points that fall under the React Native Framework’s kitty. Points that serve as justifications for developing react native apps.
Top 10 React Native Benefits
React native cross-platform apps look and function like native applications
The Native framework uses the same react-native components platform that native iOS and Android app languages use.
In contrast, hybrid apps are simply web views wrapped in a native container that runs and behaves like a web app. When it comes to the difference between a native app and a hybrid app for startups, traditional hybrid app frameworks fall far short of the smooth UX and speed that React Native apps provide. Even the most well-designed and slick web application will never be as fluid as after react-native UI development.
React Native enables sharing of a single codebase between iOS and Android
One of the primary reasons why startups prefer React Native is its write once, run anywhere nature. One of the primary features of the React Native framework allows startups to create a high-performing application in half the time and cost that Native apps require. We have built several React Native apps at Applify, and we are always amazed at how more than 80% of the code can be shared between the iOS and Android versions of the app, making the process extremely time and cost-efficient.
React Native uses ReactJS’s Programming Model
The conceptual framework used to create ReactJS web apps is also used to create React Native apps. In this situation, the startup benefits by only having to invest in one developer rather than three: Android, iOS, and web developers.
React Native Framework for External Integration and Shared Knowledge
React Native has gained rapid awareness and interest in the developer community since its official release in 2015. The React Native framework has a robust open-source ecosystem for external integration and knowledge sharing. It didn’t take long for us to become the market leader in the next generation of cross-platform app development.
One of the major challenges that most react native app development companies faced was integrating third-party systems or creating custom UI controls that were not natively supported in React Native.
Fortunately, the rapid adoption of the React Native framework has recently increased third-party integrations.
React Native Backs Some of the Top Apps in the Marketplace
There is no stronger argument in the React Native vs. Hybrid apps for startup debate than React Native powers some of the world’s most popular apps, including Instagram, Facebook, Tesla, Bloomberg, and Walmart. The widespread adoption of React Native across multiple industries is a direct indication of its long-term viability.
Comes With Components That Enable Hybrid Apps to Render Natively
The era of WebView component dominance is over. Today’s reality is React Native’s building squares, which are reusable local segments congregating in locales. The elements and components you would normally use in Android and iOS are already present in React Native to provide a consistent look and feel.
This section-based structure enables a React Native development company (in places like Texas, California, and so on) to create apps with a faster, web-style way of dealing with progression. For example, companies in Texas that develop apps using React Native provide a high degree of code reuse with prevailing UI that adheres to each platform’s style guide and best practices. The result is a quick application that comes backed with the expediency of the local portable system.
React Native is Synonymous with an Intuitive User Interface (UI)
Enables Third-Party Plugin Connectivity with a No-Glitch Experience
The presence of several third-party integrations is one of the primary reasons for using React Native for startup app development. They allow startups to avoid relying on WebView to perform functions. For example, if you want to include Google Maps in your application, React Native will allow you to do so via the native module.
The Framework is Immensely Budget-Friendly
When running a startup, the primary concern behind every startup’s app development solution is cost. Because react native app development services revolve around a single codebase and multi-platform capability, building a react native application takes much less time. In the software world, the shorter the development time, the lower the development cost.
Reusable Native Component
The WebView component, used to create hybrid mobile applications, is currently defunct. Developers of React native apps are creating blocks with reusable ‘native components’ that can be aggregated directly to native applications. Furthermore, React Native has counterparts for the components and elements used in iOS and Android app development.
As a result, designers can create a dependable look, speed, feel, and basic functionalities for the native mobile application. The reusable component-specific design enables developers to choose the web-based development approach, which is more preferred and progressive than the traditional hybrid application development process.
So that’s how React Native has everything that Hybrid apps don’t. And now that you have every reason in the world to choose it in the React Native vs. Hybrid apps for startup debate contact the team that can make it happen for you.
Why Should Startups Choose React Native?
Today, companies such as Instagram, Walmart, and Airbnb, among others, have used and continue to use React native for their creative applications. React Native is well-known for several reasons, which we will discuss in more detail below.
One Time Coding
This implies that similar libraries are being rendered for iOS and Android using the same code base. As a result, skilled and dedicated React Native programmers provide framework compatibility for Windows and tvOS. A single codebase saves developers time and resources while maintaining app quality.
Reusable Native Components
When it comes to hybrid development, cross-platform developers rely on WebView components to enhance the functionality of native components. However, React Native has counterparts to native iOS and Android components.
Equipment support for various gadgets running on various platforms is a significant issue for the half-and-half and cross-stage applications. React Native applications do not rely entirely on WebView for every native function. The application can easily access in-built hardware components of mobile devices such as GPS, Maps, and Bluetooth. The performance and user experience are both excellent.
The Final Call
Most startups in many countries, including the United Kingdom, seek easier ways to reach out to more people because time and resources are limited. When they take on projects that are far more complex than the benefits of hybrid, they look for a react native development agency in the UK.
Do you have a similar problem? Please contact our React Native mobile app developers to discuss your project.